Hatred of Democracy

Posted: April 4, 2013 in Austerity, Economy, European Union

What should we do when faced with the blind fury of the horde? How should we respond to those too ignorant to understand the necessity of austerity?

Across Europe backward people are brazenly rejecting the carefully constructed consensus of the technocrats.

In Greece, Italy and Cyprus ‘the people’ are remerging as an active political subject. They are refusing to play by the rules of choreographed professional politics.

They are learning how to say something very important, very powerful and for too long forgotten.

They are learning how to say No!

No to the policy of austerity – a policy that makes those least able pay for the cost of those most culpable.

No to the policy of bailouts – a policy that steals form the prudent saver to pay for the gambling bondholder.

No to the policy of hyperliberalism – a policy that is ‘above and beyond’ the neoliberal economics that drove the global crash of 2008.

And with each of these refusals ‘the people’ are opening up a space from which real alternatives can emerge.

To date these refusals have been isolated cries by growing minorities who have simply no more to give. They have yet to find a coherent majority expression.

They have been unable to install a real alternative government willing and able to mount a systemic challenge to the consensus.

But that challenge is growing and the technocrats are worried.

So what should be their response?

In a revealing presentation to the Oireachtas European Affairs Committee in March UCD academic and evangelist of hyperliberal Euro federalism Brigid Laffan outlined three challenges.

How can political parties and Governments present and justify the “politics of constrained choice”?

Decoded this means how can mainstream politics get public acceptance for policies that the public currently reject.

What should be done to counter the growth of “populist challenger parties”?

Decoded this means what can be done to stop the rise of Syriza in Greece, Beppe Grillo in Italy or Sinn Féin in Ireland.

How can we avoid “scapegoating” the EU for “unpopular policies and measures”?

Decoded this means how can we protect the project of European Integration from blowback caused by the policies designed and implemented by its key institutions.

For Brigid it appears that the EU is becoming too politicised; there is too much contestation; too many people are no longer willing to accept the carefully crafted consensus of the technocrats.

Something must be done!

Faced with the blind fury of the (populist) hordes -too ignorant or backward to realise the beneficent wisdom of the technocrats- Brigid wants to close down the space of politics, to limit the possibility of further refusals, to reconstruct the consensus.

There is something deeply undemocratic about Brigid’s prescription. Maybe the French writer Jacques Rancière is too harsh when he talks about a hatred of democracy. Maybe it is more of a discomfort, a distrust of the ability of people to decide for themselves.

So what should we do when faced with the blind fury of the horde? If we are democrats we should realise that they are not blind after all and add one more voice to their fury.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s